Action Log
🔗 New here? Jump to FOI Process Flow & Glossary
Action Log – WA Animal Welfare Transparency
Section titled “Action Log – WA Animal Welfare Transparency”Maintained by Hanyu Liu
Last updated: March 2026
This is a structural record — not of what was achieved,
but of what was attempted, requested, refused, and left undocumented.
Each entry is part of a wider cycle:
→ Legal request → Institutional response or silence → Public memory trace.
This log preserves that cycle,
not as progress — but as accountability.
How to read symbols: ✓ Found · ~ In process · ∅ None · ✖ Hidden
🔁 Cycle 1 – FOI on Designated Inspectors (DPIRD)
Section titled “🔁 Cycle 1 – FOI on Designated Inspectors (DPIRD)”The first record of structural refusal.
A formal trace of institutional silence.
📅 FOI1 – Timeline of Requests and Responses
Section titled “📅 FOI1 – Timeline of Requests and Responses”| Date | Event | Linked Document |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Apr 2025 | FOI lodged to DPIRD (ID 52549500734) | FOI Request |
| 1 May 2025 | ∅ DPIRD states no inspection outcomes exist | FOI Response |
| 8 May 2025 | ✖ Section 26 refusal requested + public statement | Section 26 Statement |
| 21 May 2025 | ~ Extension to 6 June accepted | Due Date Extension |
| 30 May 2025 | ∅ Notice of Decision issued — confirms absence | Notice of Decision |
| 30 May 2025 | ~ Response cycle concluded and archived | Inspection Summary |
| 7 Jun 2025 | ✖ External review prematurely lodged with OIC | OIC Rejection Notice |
| 13 Jun 2025 | ~ Internal review formally requested from DPIRD | Internal Review Request Email |
| 18 Jun 2025 | ~ DPIRD confirms internal review process initiated | Internal Review Acknowledgement |
| 30 Jun 2025 | ~ DPIRD requests 1-week extension for internal review | Extension Request |
| 8 Jul 2025 | ✖ Internal review decision issued — contradiction arises | IR Decision |
📝 FOI1 Summary
Section titled “📝 FOI1 Summary”What was asked:
Whether Designated Inspectors (DIs) conducted inspections, produced outcome summaries, or faced internal review from 2022–2025.
What was revealed:
- ∅ Initial refusal under Section 26: no documents exist.
- Only a blank template released.
- ✖ Internal Review later admitted outcome reports exist — a direct contradiction.
Structural meaning:
FOI1 = Result vacuum. (The agency claimed no results existed, then contradicted itself.)
Status: ⏳ OIC external review ongoing (Ref: FOI2025-008).
📤 External Review – OIC
Section titled “📤 External Review – OIC”| Date | Event | Linked Document |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Complaint lodged with OIC under s.65 | ER Submission |
| 17 Jul 2025 | OIC accepts review but states no timeframe | ER Acknowledge |
| 16 Sep 2025 | OIC confirms no written case allocation policy | Clarification Request |
| 28 Sep 2025 | FOI lodged with OIC itself (re case protocols) | OIC FOI Application |
| 10 Oct 2025 | ✖ OIC refuses FOI request — cites Schedule 2 exemption | OIC FOI Refusal Letter |
📝 OIC Review Summary
Section titled “📝 OIC Review Summary”- Indefinite wait at acceptance (17 Jul); OIC Annual Report shows ~40% of reviews exceed 12 months (Report).
- No written allocation policy admitted (16 Sep) → discretionary, non-chronological triage = time black hole.
- Counter-FOI lodged with OIC to obtain case-management protocols.
- ✖ Refusal issued (10 Oct) under Freedom of Information Act 1992 Schedule 2 — OIC declares itself exempt from FOI, returning payment in full. → Oversight body formally confirms it operates outside the law it enforces.
Structural meaning:
OIC = procedural illusion.
A body that exists to guarantee transparency,
but is legally shielded from transparency itself.
🧭 Oversight Escalation (Cycle 1)
Section titled “🧭 Oversight Escalation (Cycle 1)”| Date | Institution | Event / Outcome | Linked Document |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sep 2025 | Auditor General (OAG) | Submission lodged; OAG notes the matter in its intelligence database but confirms no audit action planned | OAG Reply |
| 22 Jul 2025 | Ombudsman | Complaint lodged against DPIRD for maladministration; Ombudsman replies it will wait until OIC finishes before acting | Ombudsman Letter |
| 25 Sep 2025 | Ombudsman | New complaint lodged — focuses on OIC’s indefinite delays and case allocation opacity | Complaint Form |
| 3 Oct 2025 | Ombudsman | Formal notice: no jurisdiction to investigate OIC, and DPIRD complaint placed on indefinite hold | Ombudsman No Jurisdiction |
| 9 Oct 2025 | Ombudsman | No further reply confirming the jurisdictional deadlock — OIC exempt, Ombudsman waiting on OIC, DPIRD untouched | Ombudsman No Reply |
| 16 Oct 2025 | Estimates & Financial Operations Committee | Acknowledged evidence of DPIRD funding irregularities; no follow-up recorded | Financial Committee Reply |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Public Administration Committee | Acknowledged receipt; further discussion suppressed from publication (archived privately) |
Structural meaning:
OIC = time black hole
Ombudsman = jurisdictional void
Parliament = symbolic containment
OAG = non-intervention
Together = oversight deadlock confirmed.
The Ombudsman correspondence confirms that because OIC is exempt under Schedule 1, clause 2 of the Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1971 (WA), it cannot be investigated, and since DPIRD’s FOI remains before the OIC, the Ombudsman will not act on DPIRD either — a closed circuit of procedural deferral.
🔁 Cycle 2 – FOI2: Oversight & Institutional Risk Blind Spots
Section titled “🔁 Cycle 2 – FOI2: Oversight & Institutional Risk Blind Spots”A structured escalation — from absence of data, to absence of oversight.
📅 FOI2 – Timeline
Section titled “📅 FOI2 – Timeline”| Date | Event | Linked Document |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | FOI2 submitted to DPIRD | FOI2 Email, FOI2 Form |
| 10 Jul 2025 | ~ Acknowledgement of FOI2 by DPIRD | FOI2 Acknowledgement |
| 20 Aug 2025 | ~ Extension requested by DPIRD | Extension Email |
| 8 Sep 2025 | ∅ Notice of Decision: Section 26 — no oversight/risk/SOP | Notice of Decision |
| 10 Sep 2025 | ✖ Internal review request lodged | IR2 Application |
| 10 Sep 2025 | ~ IR2 acknowledged, due by 25 Sep | IR2 Acknowledge |
| 17 Sep 2025 | ~ IR2 extension requested | IR2 Extension |
| 2 Oct 2025 | ✖ Internal Review Decision — confirms unreasonable search & misconstruction | IR2 Decision |
| 2 Oct 2025 | ✓ External Review lodged with OIC (ER2) | ER2 Application |
| 15 Jan 2026 | ~ OIC acknowledgement received for ER2 | ER2 OIC Email, ER2 Acknowledge Letter |
📝 FOI2 Summary
Section titled “📝 FOI2 Summary”What was asked:
Whether DPIRD had any internal rules, risk assessments, or oversight systems for Designated Inspectors.
What was revealed:
- ∅ Refused under Section 26 — said no such documents exist.
- Searches limited only to the words “Designated Inspector,” missing broader terms like policy or risk.
- ✖ Internal Review confirmed this narrow search, showing the system avoided its own oversight.
Structural meaning:
FOI2 = Process vacuum.
The agency proved it has no rules or risk controls for its own inspectors.
Status: ⏳ External review accepted into the OIC queue (ER2).
🔁 Cycle 3 – FOI3: Ministerial Briefings & Integrity Channels
Section titled “🔁 Cycle 3 – FOI3: Ministerial Briefings & Integrity Channels”From missing data → to missing escalation pathways.
📅 FOI3 – Timeline
Section titled “📅 FOI3 – Timeline”| Date | Event | Linked Document |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2025 | FOI3 lodged: ministerial briefings, OAG/Ombudsman contact, DI audits | FOI3 Application |
| 25 Aug 2025 | ~ DPIRD acknowledges FOI3 | FOI3 Acknowledge |
| 13 Oct 2025 | ∅ Notice of Decision — no ministerial briefings, no inter-agency reporting | Decision |
| 14 Oct 2025 | ✓ Internal Review lodged (IR3) | IR3 Application |
| 15 Oct 2025 | ✓ IR3 acknowledgement received | IR3 Acknowledge |
| 24 Oct 2025 | ~ IR3 extension request from DPIRD | IR3 Extension |
| 7 Nov 2025 | ✖ IR3 decision issued — confirms narrow scope and “no documents” position | IR3 Decision |
| 9 Nov 2025 | ✓ External Review lodged with OIC (ER3) | ER3 Application |
| 1 Dec 2025 | ~ OIC acknowledgement received for ER3 | ER3 OIC Email, ER3 Acknowledge Letter |
📝 FOI3 Summary
Section titled “📝 FOI3 Summary”What was asked:
Whether the Minister, Parliament, or oversight bodies ever received briefings or reports about these missing inspection systems.
What was revealed:
- ∅ DPIRD said no briefings, reports, or communications exist.
- ✖ Internal Review maintained that position by applying an artificially narrow search logic.
- The chain of accountability ends where it begins.
Structural meaning:
FOI3 = Accountability vacuum.
No upward reporting, no escalation, no record of responsibility.
Status: ⏳ External review accepted into the OIC queue (ER3).
🔁 Cycle 4 – FOI4: Recordkeeping, Legal Authority & Financial Accountability
Section titled “🔁 Cycle 4 – FOI4: Recordkeeping, Legal Authority & Financial Accountability”The system was asked to prove that it keeps records of its own existence.
📅 FOI4 – Timeline
Section titled “📅 FOI4 – Timeline”| Date | Event | Linked Document |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2025 | ✓ FOI4 lodged – recordkeeping, appointments, training, finance | FOI4 Application |
| 13 Oct 2025 | ✓ Acknowledgement received from DPIRD | FOI4 Acknowledge |
| 31 Oct 2025 | ✓ Applicant narrows scope to prevent s.20 refusal | FOI4 Scope Clarification Email |
| 21 Nov 2025 – 13 Feb 2026 | ~ DPIRD requests four successive extensions during access phase | FOI4 Extension Chain |
| 13 Feb 2026 | ✖ Applicant refuses any further extension beyond the permitted period | FOI4 Extension Chain |
| 14 Feb 2026 | ✖ Deemed refusal triggers internal review application | FOI4 IR Application / Rejection Chain |
| 17 Feb 2026 | ✓ Internal Review acknowledged by DPIRD | FOI4 IR Acknowledge |
| 27 Feb 2026 | ~ DPIRD requests short IR extension to 6 Mar 2026 | FOI4 IR Extension Chain + Rejection |
| 27 Feb 2026 | ✓ Applicant agrees to short extension only to 6 Mar 2026 | FOI4 IR Extension Chain + Rejection |
| 6–10 Mar 2026 | ✖ DPIRD seeks further IR extension; applicant refuses; agency points applicant to OIC while continuing to “process” the matter | FOI4 IR Extension Chain + Rejection |
| Mar 2026 | ✓ External Review lodged with OIC (ER4) | ER4 Acknowledge Email |
📝 FOI4 Summary
Section titled “📝 FOI4 Summary”What was asked:
Whether DPIRD keeps lawful appointment, training, recordkeeping, and financial records for the Designated Inspector program.
What was revealed:
- No substantive access decision was issued after nearly five months.
- DPIRD requested four extensions during the access phase.
- Once the matter moved to internal review, the review itself also became a site of serial delay.
- After the applicant refused any further extension, DPIRD acknowledged that refusal, stated the application was still being processed, and directed the applicant to the OIC.
Structural meaning:
FOI4 = Compliance vacuum / delay as denial.
The question was no longer merely whether records existed, but whether the FOI system itself could still produce a decision within its own review structure.
Status: ⏳ External review lodged; no substantive FOI4 decision has yet been provided.
🔁 Cycle 5 – FOI5: Minister’s Office Oversight (AWAC & DI Governance)
Section titled “🔁 Cycle 5 – FOI5: Minister’s Office Oversight (AWAC & DI Governance)”A vertical test of whether the Minister’s office held any real trace of oversight.
📅 FOI5 – Timeline
Section titled “📅 FOI5 – Timeline”| Date | Event | Linked Document |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2025 | ✓ FOI5 lodged to Minister’s Office – AWAC reports, DI governance briefings, ministerial oversight | FOI5 Application |
| Dec 2025 – Jan 2026 | ~ Two extensions requested during processing | FOI5 Extension Chain |
| 27 Feb 2026 | ✖ Notice of Decision issued – partial access granted, key ministerial briefing documents withheld | FOI5 Result |
| 2 Mar 2026 | ✓ Applicant seeks internal review | FOI5 IR Request + Rejection |
| 8 Mar 2026 | ✓ Follow-up sent re review / search concerns | FOI5 IR Request + Rejection |
| 10 Mar 2026 | ✖ Ministerial FOI Unit confirms no internal review is available because the original decision was made by the principal officer | FOI5 IR Request + Rejection |
| Mar 2026 | ✓ External Review lodged with OIC (ER5) | ER5 Acknowledge Email |
📝 FOI5 Summary
Section titled “📝 FOI5 Summary”What was asked:
Whether the Minister’s Office held:
- AWAC annual reports;
- DI governance briefings;
- any ministerial-level records showing oversight of the missing systems identified in FOI1–FOI4.
What was revealed:
- Some low-risk documents were released (including AWAC annual reports and inspector training material).
- The key ministerial briefing chain was withheld.
- The Notice of Decision misstated the timeframe, which was later corrected by email.
- The Ministerial FOI Unit later asserted that AWAC was not functioning in 2024–2025, yet did not produce a clear documentary chain explaining that absence.
- Internal review was closed off because the original decision had been made by the Minister as principal officer.
Structural meaning:
FOI5 = Ministerial visibility without accountability.
At the top of the system, some peripheral traces were visible, but the documents most capable of showing real ministerial knowledge or responsibility were shielded or procedurally neutralised.
Status: ⏳ External review lodged with OIC (ER5).
✉️ Institutional Contact Log
Section titled “✉️ Institutional Contact Log”All correspondence here is public interest–driven, grouped by institutional role.
Each FOI cycle: the institutions listed below are notified by broadcast email of new outcomes.
Note: This log only covers accountability broadcasts to institutional nodes. One-on-one exchanges with NGOs or individuals are not archived.
1. Government Oversight & Accountability
Section titled “1. Government Oversight & Accountability”- WA FOI Commissioner (OIC)
- WA Ombudsman
- Office of the Auditor General (OAG)
- Public Administration Committee Secretariat
- Environment and Public Affairs Committee Secretariat
- Minister for Agriculture & Food
- Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (AWAC)
2. Animal Welfare & Advocacy Organisations
Section titled “2. Animal Welfare & Advocacy Organisations”- Animal Justice Party (AJP WA)
- Animals Australia
- RSPCA WA
- Anonymous for the Voiceless (Perth)
- Sentient
- Animal Liberation
- Australian Alliance for Animals
- Voiceless
3. Media & Public Scrutiny
Section titled “3. Media & Public Scrutiny”- ABC News
- WA Today
- The West Australian
- The Guardian Australia
- SBS Australia
- 9News
- PerthNow
- Crikey
- Farm Transparency Project (FTP)
- The Conversation
4. Political/Parliamentary Recipients
Section titled “4. Political/Parliamentary Recipients”- WA Greens (incl. Jess Beckerling MLC)
- WA Labor (committee members)
- Legislative Council Members (Standing Committees)
- Select Committee on Animal Welfare
5. Broadcast Emails
Section titled “5. Broadcast Emails”- FOI1 Broadcast – Parliament, NGOs, Media
- FOI2 Broadcast – Parliament, NGOs, Media
- FOI3 Broadcast – Parliament, NGOs, Media
📥 Responses Received
Section titled “📥 Responses Received”- Jess Beckerling (Greens WA)
- Public Administration Committee Secretariat
- Office of Sandra Carr MLC
- Estimates & Financial Operations Committee Secretariat
- Public Administration Committee Secretariat — acknowledged receipt without commitment or timeline; follow-up discussion suppressed from publication and likely indefinitely archived, so the original correspondence cannot be publicly released.
- Parliamentary Reply re FOI3 (Oct 2025)
🧭 Current Review Stage
Section titled “🧭 Current Review Stage”- ER1: OIC review ongoing – FOI1 (results vacuum)
- ER2: OIC review acknowledged – FOI2 (process vacuum)
- ER3: OIC review acknowledged – FOI3 (accountability vacuum)
- ER4: OIC review lodged – FOI4 (compliance vacuum / delay as denial)
- ER5: OIC review lodged – FOI5 (ministerial oversight vacuum)
Archive Expansion:
- cross-cycle vacuum map
- OIC delay chronology
- FOI4 / FOI5 procedural erosion analysis
- visual timeline of “delay as denial” across access → IR → ER
This archive is not static.
Each new request is a test of what the system refuses to hold.
This is not against institutions.
It is against the belief that animals can disappear without a trace.
🔄 FOI Process Flow
Section titled “🔄 FOI Process Flow”FOI Request (Freedom of Information)
↓
Agency Response
- ✓ Documents released
- ∅ “No documents” (Section 26)
- ✖ Refused / Exempt
- ~ Extension / Procedural delay
↓
Internal Review (IR) - Applicant challenges decision inside same agency
- Agency may confirm, reverse, or contradict itself
↓
External Review (ER) – OIC - Independent review of whether the search was “reasonable”
- BUT: often indefinite backlog, opaque allocation
↓
Ombudsman / Auditor General / Parliament - Higher oversight bodies
- Risk of deadlock: Ombudsman won’t act until OIC concludes
↓
Public Archive (unseenbeings.org) - All refusals, delays, contradictions documented as record
📖 Glossary of Key Terms
Section titled “📖 Glossary of Key Terms”- FOI (Freedom of Information) – Legal right to request government documents.
- Section 26 – Official refusal: agency claims “no documents exist.”
- IR (Internal Review) – Second look by the same agency when you challenge a decision.
- ER (External Review) – Escalation to the Information Commissioner (OIC). Checks only if a “reasonable search” was done.
- OIC (Office of the Information Commissioner) – Handles ER, but operates with backlog and no transparent triage rules.
- Ombudsman – Investigates maladministration, but usually only after OIC finishes → procedural loop.
- OAG (Office of the Auditor General) – Audits government operations, but rarely intervenes in live FOI disputes.
- DPIRD (Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development) – WA government department responsible for animal welfare enforcement.
- AWAC (Animal Welfare Advisory Committee) – Statutory committee meant to advise on animal welfare policy and oversight; however, in practice provides no evidence of supervising DI enforcement.
- Vacuum – A structural gap: missing results, missing processes, or missing accountability.
- Deadlock – Oversight bodies blocking each other; no action moves forward.
💬 Want to understand the method behind this archive? Read the About page